Category: Paper in a Pic

@SuneelUpadhye Exactly. One of the authors responded in the comment section of the journal’s retraction. Take a ltwitter.com/i/web/status/1…b3iy

@rrmatthews Good question for the authors of this study. google.ca/amp/s/amp.theg…

@gabe_fontaine @jonathanstea @RayDalio Must be willing to consider evidence that goes against our positions to resiâ€twitter.com/i/web/status/1…B4

Authors requested the retraction. What about the journal’s responsibility? - peer reviewers - decision editor -twitter.com/i/web/status/1…ZSBk

I can’t believe it was even published! Also can’t believe it took 7 years to retract? @inquisitiveGyneGyn fortwitter.com/i/web/status/1…KHxx7u

RT @jonathanstea: People don’t like when their worldviews are poked/prodded. It can feel upsetting when it’s suggested that the way in whi…

@tallpsychology @AMC_Signpost @DrJenGunter @jonathanstea @NightShiftMD @CaulfieldTim A form of denominator neglect or base rate fallacy.

@DudesInterview #batdoc will be there dudes. https://t.co/rjIXZhsM1U

@AMC_Signpost @DrJenGunter @tallpsychology @jonathanstea @NightShiftMD @CaulfieldTim I will let @tallpsychology to respond to your comment.

@ShoenbergerJan Congrats Dr. Shoenberger. Well deserved. There are many amazing women of EM.â€twitter.com/i/web/status/1…8w