Pages Navigation Menu

Meet 'em, greet 'em, treat 'em and street 'em

SGEM#44: Pause (Etomidate and Rapid Sequence Intubation in Sepsis)

SGEM#44: Pause (Etomidate and Rapid Sequence Intubation in Sepsis)

Podcast Link:SGEM#44
Date:  September 15, 2013
Title: Pause: Etomidate and RSI in Sepsis
Guest Skeptic: Dr. Suneel Upadhye, McMaster University

  • Associate Clin Prof EM, Assoc Member Dept CEB McMaster University
  • Chair, CAEP Guideline Committee
  • Sepsis publications: JEM 2009 MEDS score review, CCRT CJEM 2007

Case Scenario: 70 year old man arrives by ambulance from home with complaining of being weak and dizzy. No specific complaints of chest pain, shortness of breath, abdominal pain or focal weakness.  He has a history of hypertension, benign prostatic hypertrophy, dyslipidemia and osteoarthritis. His vital signs are blood pressure  76/48mmHg, heart rate  110bpm , oxygen sat 86% and temperature of 39.5C. He is difficult to rouse and you decide he needs rapid sequence intubation.

Screen Shot 2013-09-14 at 1.18.41 PMQuestion:  Can you use Etomidate for RSI in septic patients?

Background: Sepsis has received more attention over the last 5 years or so. This includes the Surviving Sepsis Campaign and the Early Goal-Directed Therapy. Both ACEP and CAEP have guidelines that address optimal management of severe sepsis.

Definition of sepsis: “Sepsis is defined as the presence of both systemic inflammatory response syndrome and the suspicion of an infection. Sepsis is a syndrome, and can range from relatively mild (simple infection) to severe (septic shock and multiorgan dysfunction). Morbidity and mortality increase if a patient deteriorates from sepsis to severe sepsis to multiorgan dysfunction (CAEP)”.

Key Aspects Early Recognition (Grade of Recommendation):

  • Intravenous Fluids (Grade B)
  • Intubations (Grade D)
  • Central Venous Pressure Monitoring (Grade D)
  • Vasopressors (Grade B)
  • Inotropes (Grade D)
  • Lactate Levels (Grade B)
  • Cultures (Grade D)
  • Broad Spectrum Antibiotics (Grade C)
  • Steroids (Grade D)
  • Blood Transfusions (Grade B)
  • Activated Protein C (Grade D)
  • Glucose Control (Grade D)

ACEP Surviving Sepsis Campaign Bundles 2012:Screen Shot 2013-09-14 at 1.22.50 PM

To Be Completed within 3 hrs:
1) Measure lactate level
2) Obtain blood cultures prior to administration of antibiotics
3) Administer broad spectrum antibiotics
4) Administer 30 ml/kg crystalloid for hypotension or lactate ≥4mmol/L

To Be Completed within 6hrs:
5) Apply vasopressors (for hypotension that does not respond to initial fluid resuscitation) to maintain a mean arterial pressure (MAP) ≥65 mm Hg
6) In the event of persistent arterial hypotension despite volume resuscitation (septic shock) or initial lactate ≥4 mmol/L (36 mg/dL):
–Measure central venous pressure (CVP)*
–Measure central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO2)*
7) Remeasure lactate if initial lactate was elevated*

*Targets for quantitative resuscitation included in the guidelines are CVP of ≥8 mm Hg; ScvO2 of ≥70%, and normalization of lactate.

Reference: Chan CM et al, Etomidate is associated with mortality and adrenal insufficiency in sepsis: a meta-analysis. Crit Care Med 2012; 40: 2945-2953

  • Population: Septic patients requiring mechanical ventilation (pediatrics excluded)
  • Intervention: Single dose etomidate for RSI
  • Comparison: Other various sedative agents
  • Outcome: Mortality (all-cause, RCT only, 28 days), adrenal insufficiency

Results:

Screen Shot 2013-09-14 at 12.54.19 PMMortality Outcomes (5 studies, n=867 patients):  INCREASED risk of all-cause death with etomidate (RR 1.20; 95%CI 1.02-1.42, I2 = 4.9%). No difference in subgroup analyses with RCT results only, or standardized mortality at 28days.  The 95%CI intervals in the all-cause and subgroup mortality analyses are rather wide.  Adrenal Insufficiency (7 studies, n=1303 patients): INCREASED risk of AI with etomidate (RR 1.33; 95%CI 1.22-1.46, I2=43.9%).  No difference in sensitivity analysis with RCTs only.

Authors Conclusion: “Administration of etomidate for rapid sequence intubation is associated with higher rates of adrenal insufficiency and mortality in patients with sepsis.”

BEEM Comments: This new review raises concerns about the safety of etomidate in septic RSI, as it is the first review that focusses on mortality issues rather than prior studies looking at AI only.  The conclusions for mortality risk must be qualified, however, since the biggest study driving the mortality outcome is a postive observational substudy of the CORTICUS RCT by Cuthbertson et al (499 patients) which contributes 37.66-55.84% of the patients to the pooled results in various subgroups.  Inspection of the forest plot reveals that this is the only positive study suggesting harm, and the other included studies show no significant difference.  It is clear that excluding the Cuthbertson data would render the results statistically insignificant, which raises doubt about the overall mortality conclusions. Furthermore, the Cuthbertson cohort of patients scored relatively high on the SAPS II score (mean 48; IQR 37-62) which confers a hospital mortality of almost 50%.  Other trials had similar illness severity SAPS II scores, yet found insignificant differences in groups (smaller sample sizes).  It is not clear why the Cuthbertson results are an outlier compared to other studies/RCTs, and the results of pooling would certainly not be robust if this one study were removed. The authors do not address why the Cuthbertson results seem to be so different from other included studies…A more conservative and methodologically sound MA by Hohl et al (Cdn researcher Vancouver, published Annals EM 2010), rightly excluded this large observational study from RCT SR/MA, and there was no result suggesting increased mortality from etomidate bolus use in RSI in septic shock patients.  Specific critiques of the Cuthbertson can also be found in Int J Intens Care 2010 (Pallin and Walls), in CJEM 2011 (Green et al), and most recently in Annals EM 2013 (Syn Snap, Hunter & Kirschner, Indiana University Sch of Med).

BEEM Bottom Line: This review updates the controversy on using single-dose etomidate for RSI in septic patients, and raises more concerns about increased in-hospital mortality.  However, this is based on a single large observational substudy of a failed RCT, and it is not clear why these trial results were so different from others.  This is enough information to give PAUSE to routine use of etomidate in septic RSI, but not to abandon it completely.

Case Resolution: You initiate 1L normal saline bolus. Do a rapid sequence intubation using etomidate, draw laboratory tests including blood/urine cultures, start broad spectrum antibiotics and call the ICU for admission.

More Sepsis Information:

  • Walls and Murphy. Clinical Controversies: Etomidate as an Induction Agent for Endotracheal Intubation in Patients With Sepsis. Ann Emerg Med. 2008 Jul;52(1):13-4. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.01.344.
  • Hohl et al. The Effect of a Bolus Dose of Etomidate on Cortisol Levels, Mortality, and Health Services Utilization: A Systematic Review. doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.01.030
  • Hunter and Kirschner. In Patients With Severe Sepsis, Does a Single Dose of Etomidate to Facilitate Intubation Increase Mortality?  Ann Emerg Med Vol 61, No. 5: May 3013
  • Green and Gorman. Safety of etomidate bolus administration in patients with septic shock. CJEM 2011;13(2):105-108
  • Cuthbertson et al. The effects of etomidate on adrenal responsiveness and mortality in patients with septic shock. Intensive Care Med (2009) 35:1868–1876

KEENER KONTEST: Last weeks winner was Joseph Merryweather from Melrose Park, Illinois. He provided five other causes of elevated troponin besides acute myocardial infarction (pulmonary embolism, congestive heart failure, myocarditis, pericarditis, and blunt chest trauma).

Listen to the podcast to hear this weeks question. Send your answers to TheSGEM@gmail.com with keener kontest in the subject line. Be the first one correctly answer the question and you will receive a cool skeptical prize.

Follow the SGEM on twitter @TheSGEM and like TheSGEM on Facebook.

Remember to be skeptical of anything you learn, even if you heard it on The Skeptics Guide to Emergency Medicine.

  • Steve

    Ah the etomidate in sepsis debate. One thing to consider is that the initial idea that etomidate may not be good in sepsis originally came from when etomidate was being used as a continuos infusion for sedation like we used midazolam or propofol today. There is a reference out there somewhere for that but it’s getting pretty late here in my part of town. This is much different from a one time bolus dose whose effects seem to go away quickly. It probably is the case that prolonged continuous adrenal suppression = bad and short adrenal suppression = not so bad.

    However- why not make this debate moot by using my best friend for RSI instead- I’m talking about vitamin K…ketamine! Ketamine provides excellent intubating conditions, analgesia, and sedation with a great safety profile and an actual effect of raising BP. There really isn’t anything ketamine can’t do- I would even argue that every patient in the ED should get at least some ketamine during their stay- it would definitely result in calmer waiting rooms and higher patient satisfaction scores. The only caution is to push it slowly (can cause apnea if pushed fast) and reduce the dose in shocked patients (ala a recent EmCrit episode).

    Thoughts?

    Love the SGEM- keep up the great work

    Steve Carroll
    embasic.org

    • TheSGem

      Thanks for the comments. I will share with the twitter. I too am using more Ketamine in a wider variety of patients.
      Glad you like the podcast.
      This week will be on sedation in psych patients. Stay tuned and stay skeptical:)
      Ken

    • Responding to Steve C. on Sept 19 podcast re: etomidate in sepsis…Steve’s comments about the safety of using ketamine instead of etomidate are bang on, and supported by a large RCT by Jabre et al (Lancet 2009), showing no difference in outcomes (SOFA scores, mortality) between ketamine vs etomidate in critically ill patients (only 76 septic patients)…if not contraindicated, ketamine is also a fine choice in septic patients…but the take-home message from the podcast is that etomidate is NOT UNSAFE in septic patients!! Thanks…
      Suneel

    • TheSGem

      Responding to Steve C. on Sept 19 podcast re: etomidate in sepsis…Steve’s comments about the safety of using ketamine instead of etomidate are bang on, and supported by a large RCT by Jabre et al (Lancet 2009), showing no difference in outcomes (SOFA scores, mortality) between ketamine vs etomidate in critically ill patients (only 76 septic patients)…if not contraindicated, ketamine is also a fine choice in septic patients…but the take-home message from the podcast is that etomidate is NOT UNSAFE in septic patients!! Thanks…Suneel

  • Pingback: SGEM#47: Hail to the Chief | The Skeptics Guide to Emergency Medicine()

  • Pingback: SGEM#93: Ketamine, A Bad Reputation? | The Skeptics Guide to Emergency Medicine()

  • Pingback: SGEM#113: EGDT – ProMISe(s) ProMISe(s) | The Skeptics Guide to Emergency Medicine()

  • Pingback: SGEM#168: HYPRESS – Doesn’t Got the Power | The Skeptics Guide to Emergency Medicine()

  • Pingback: SGEM#174: Don’t Believe the Hype – Vitamin C Cocktail for Sepsis | The Skeptics Guide to Emergency Medicine()